Thank you for compiling these possible approaches. Some of them are already taking place using physics simulation as seen in:https://twitter.com/_GM_AI_/status/1009851579267190785 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Thank you for compiling these possible approaches. Some of them are already taking place using physics simulation as seen in:https://twitter.com/_GM_AI_/status/1009851579267190785 …
Why would we want to do that? They should help us, not replicate us...https://chappyessays.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/machines-will-never-think-like-us/ …
And why is that? Why are we so special? Because we are made of biomass? If an "artificial" intelligence is made it won't be much different from us, we are biological machines
Naive CS majors might believe we are biological machines; once you become aware of your soul, you will feel otherwise.
Honestly I don't think we have the current concept of a soul, but hey we will only know when we die
Seeking universal laws governing both biological and artificial intelligence:
Comparing planes and birds with universal Aerodynamics of our environment was really thought provoking...
Enjoyed reading this article !!
Interesting that there is no mention about the work of @Numenta or @JeffCHawkins . Isn't it relevant?
FYI - For the "Seeking Universal Laws" section there is a much more direct rebuttal available. Sir George Cayley extensively studied both birds and fish to discover the principles of aerodynamics. Seehttps://www.amazon.com/Man-Who-Discovered-Flight/dp/0771029713/ …
Our technology is based on actual Neuroscience. It’s just the beginning.
I love this post and the work and ideas behind it. I think it's a very promising direction for general AI and better human understanding. Reminds me of @stanfordsymsys vision statement, upgraded with all the major changes in the last 30 years.
Amazing read, thanks for this gem.
For me a wonderful sequel of the interdisciplinary approach in the 1980s, when biologists (Maturana, Varela), biophysicists (v. Foerster) and sociologists (Luhmann) etc. looked at #AI not only from a "hardware" perspective (5th gen computer). @IoannaGogolin
The dim-bulb efficiencies may turn out to be consequential :). It is hard to be alive and intelligent in a hostile universe. Intelligence is an incidental effect of husbandry. Inference is immaterial. Meaning has no thermodynamic burden. @drfeifei
Great article. Makes me think of #GilbertSimondon who explored the life-artifact relation on philosophical grounds in his seminal book : On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/on-the-mode-of-existence-of-technical-objects … …
Amazing article...human cognition in AI is always fascinating and this article has covered all aspects it... wonderful read
Outstanding post. The quest to learn to learn continues...
Any advice for someone going into neuroscience academia Dr. Ganguli? It’s so interdisciplinary and many advances are made with computational skills that are hard to develop alongside experimental techniques. Is trying to dive into each of these disciplines too risky to pursue?
GREAT post! The example of playing tennis to understand the challenge of credit assingment on AI was very helpful.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.