Hilariously, David is unknowingly supporting @AnnMarieNavar's comparison. Antivaxers frequently go straight for the pharma shill gambit, and his first go-to move is to invoke the pharma shill gambit rather than addressing substance—very much like an antivaxer.
https://twitter.com/LDLSkeptic/status/1144280418277044227 …
-
-
In this case, it's not false equivalence. David's first move was right out of the antivax playbook. It's not a good way to start if he wants to show
@AnnMarieNavar wrong. It's exactly the opposite of a good way to start.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Besides other propagandists, I don't think anyone takes this propagandist seriously. I challenged some of his nonsense and got blocked. He then calls out others that block him. Doh!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly what I was thinking but you put it so well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.