TFW your preprint is so bad that the platform itself has to issue a new cautionary note about the papers posted on it:https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/1223598414493077505 …
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
TFW your preprint is so bad that the platform itself has to issue a new cautionary note about the papers posted on it:https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/1223598414493077505 …
Debunked by Big Corona
Openness usually aligns with more robust science reaching the public eye but preprints, IMO, are an exception.
An argument for MUCH bigger “this is not peer-reviewed” notices - and to mandate putting them on the actual PDF as well.
OMG. Any biochem undergrad could tell you that with amino acid sequences this short, the alignment could be due to chance, contrary to the assertion of the paper. Even if there's some kind of functional similarity, that could just be convergent evolution.
Echoes of this paper will ring through conspiracy circles for decades. Seriously. Decades.
China should accept USA’s request to help and let American scientists in and investigate together. That’ll refute man-made virus rumour more effectively.
But then they can’t control the information as completely as they do now.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.