Stuart Ritchie

@StuartJRitchie

Lecturer at , King's College London. Looks like a 'cartoonish' 'startled hedgehog'.

London
scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user…
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2010.
1.737 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @StuartJRitchie

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @StuartJRitchie

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. srp 2019.

    I finished the first draft of my book!! Now, could everyone please STOP doing any meta-scientific studies, uncovering scientific frauds, or criticising shoddy research for the next 9 months or so, so the book doesn't end up being out of date when it's published? Thank you.

    35 replies 37 proslijeđenih tweetova 654 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati

    Out today in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review: How genetic research had advanced our knowledge of the link between cognition and learning & Robert Plomin.

    33 proslijeđena tweeta 75 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 18 sati

    Bringing together researchers/innovators from Japan and the UK to explore cross-cultural collaborations aimed for future grant calls , and the JSPS. Register here:

    , , i još njih 2
    9 proslijeđenih tweetova 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    (This story is a few years old but, forgive me, I just thought of that joke)

    9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    I Heard You Paint Houses (with a big red "X" on the door due to the resurgence of communicable diseases caused by your anti-vaccine activism)

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 33 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    "You just have to Google smartphone addiction and you’d be convinced that it is a thing, even though it is not a psychiatrically recognised disorder. To talk about smartphones affecting the brain is a really slippery slope"

    19 replies 162 proslijeđena tweeta 441 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 1. velj

    Social-psychology pals: does anyone know of a large-scale, pre-registered replication attempt of the Minimal Group Paradigm? I've just had a quick look and can't find one, which is quite surprising given what a big deal that effect is...! (Cc. )

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    Two investigations both found that this high-powered genetics prof ran his lab at UCL so "recklessly" that it produced potentially dozens of fraudulent papers (even if he himself didn't commit the fraud). He's taking zero responsibility. Jolly good then!

    9 replies 40 proslijeđenih tweetova 103 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 1. velj

    TFW your preprint is so bad that the platform itself has to issue a new cautionary note about the papers posted on it:

    We’ve just put an additional, cautionary note about the use of preprints on every
    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 31. sij

    Scientists post dodgy-looking preprint that heavily implies the new coronavirus might have been engineered by humans (because it shares some features with HIV). It appears to have been debunked almost immediately.

    These short inserts do indeed exist in relative to its closest sequenced relative (BetaCoV/bat/Yunnan/RaTG13/2013, seen here ). However, a simple BLAST of such short sequences shows match to a huge variety of organisms. No reason to conclude HIV.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    10 replies 63 proslijeđena tweeta 211 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I've been looking for a correct definition of p values in textbooks... and no wonder everyone has trouble with this. Most of the definitions are straight up wrong. Here follows a list of incorrect examples:

    27 replies 185 proslijeđenih tweetova 588 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Blog post: Are frauds incompetent? Why I think we're only catching a fraction of data fakers, and why data forensics isn't up to the task.

    9 replies 40 proslijeđenih tweetova 98 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    🚬🔫

    So is +45 (from a 3rd paper). He even left the formula in the .xls file on Dryad. Going through, you can see that some individual's recordings were boosted by +45 to increase within-group variability, in the trt groups for which the authors predicted high variability
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    I am not excited to say that there were similar problems in the raw data of another of my papers - this paper is now retracted too. I know there might be some interest in what's going on so here is the full account of how and why I came to this decision:

    160 replies 324 proslijeđena tweeta 1.691 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    When faked data are uncovered, they are very often crude and "obvious" in their construction. Are we not catching smarter fakers because most fakers are not smart, or because the data they fake is too realistic for us to spot them?

    27 replies 26 proslijeđenih tweetova 41 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    The newest preprint from our group! Using three waves of data on brain volume in older age to uncover the patterns of age-related changes in the cortex. By the estimable .

    9 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 28. sij

    The newest preprint from our group! Using three waves of data on brain volume in older age to uncover the patterns of age-related changes in the cortex. By the estimable .

    9 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 27. sij

    Love to see all the academics replying here just casually mentioning, for the avoidance of any doubt, what their h-index is.

    Sunday afternoon fun. Take the square root of your total citation count and divide by 2 and you'll pretty much end up with your H-index. Thanks to Ian Rowlands for this little gem, further proving that the H-index is just a function of total cites & as such is totally redundant.
    6 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 73 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 26. sij

    But seriously - this is great. I've always thought that the "Impact" sections of grants are an invitation for bullshit, hype, and over-claiming ("this research will... cure psychiatric disease!!"). If this report is accurate, we should all be glad to see the back of them.

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 26. sij

    Want to hear about my luck? Last year I failed to get a UKRI Fellowship, and the only negative feedback was that my "Impact" sections weren't good enough. And now, see below! THAT'S my luck. 😩

    EXCLUSIVE: UKRI to scrap impact sections from grant applications. Internal memo reveals plans to scrap Pathways to Impact and Summary Impact statement from applications.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    3 proslijeđena tweeta 79 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 25. sij

    Bought a massive haggis (inside a real sheep’s stomach and everything) and had a wonderful Burns Supper with the gang. Happy , pals!

    Korisnici , i
    9 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 88 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@StuartJRitchie još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·