Reality doesn't contain anything that is a model, for reality is the thing the model is of
-
-
Replying to @StoryOfSystem
What then are meta-models modeling? Things somehow not in reality? The models themselves are also implemented on real hardware
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robcobbable
Meta-models (trivially, but formally) model models. We assume that the reality running the program is same reality the program is modeling
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StoryOfSystem
Then what's the distinction between reality running the program and the program being 'in' reality? Smells kinda like dualism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robcobbable
This reply was suddenly insightful, thanks. Original tweet was (a consistent?) AI-theoretic idea, and spilled into a philosophical concept
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StoryOfSystem
Instrumentally useful not to self-model / model other models. Much simpler. Model accuracy trades against compute and memory
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Leverage distinguishes, psychologically, between implicit and explicit models; one would presumably use model-of-self to tune the ratio
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.