Reality doesn't contain anything that is a model, for reality is the thing the model is of
Meta-models (trivially, but formally) model models. We assume that the reality running the program is same reality the program is modeling
-
-
Then what's the distinction between reality running the program and the program being 'in' reality? Smells kinda like dualism
-
This reply was suddenly insightful, thanks. Original tweet was (a consistent?) AI-theoretic idea, and spilled into a philosophical concept
-
Instrumentally useful not to self-model / model other models. Much simpler. Model accuracy trades against compute and memory
-
Leverage distinguishes, psychologically, between implicit and explicit models; one would presumably use model-of-self to tune the ratio
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.