isn't this just up arrow notation?
-
-
Replying to @davidmanheim
Ugh, was going for something probably incoherent: { 3^3 3^^^3 3^ ... (3^^^3 times) ... ^3 ... } after 3^^^3 steps = 3##3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StoryOfSystem
Right, that's up-arrow notation; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth%27s_up-arrow_notation …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidmanheim
This sun is under the impression that 3


3 is the same as 3^^^3, the wiki says I'm right I don't care if you're the expert1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StoryOfSystem
right, and you were doing 3


3, no new notation is needed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidmanheim @StoryOfSystem
but there are faster growing functions; busybeaver(3^^^3) obviously dwarfs that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @davidmanheim
This sun is interested in fast-growing easy to compute functions (contra BB) to describe extent of hatred for outgroup members
2:54 PM - 3 Aug 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.