good faith or not this is just wrong. Fact they mention a "battle" sorta shows they wanna make money outta mental health :/
And for those saying @NME done this with no bad intent, they know exactly what they're doing. They couldn't get me on the cover so done this
-
-
Bad form absolutely. Would you be happy with a formal apology and donation of all profits to a mental health charity?
-
-
you can legit sue the hell out of them for this. Speak to your lawyers asap!!!
-
To the people at NME never play with people's lives Ever .. No matter what or how it benefits you.
#integrityeveryday -
the fact they didn't @ you says a lot in itself
-
1) You're an AMAZING person for talking about it 2) TOTALLY right in that it's *your* story, only you decide how it's shared
#love -
they're leeches with no integrity
-
that's so out of order & extremely insensitive! Anything for a profit?
-
I agree with you, this should not have been published. They haven't done it to help anyone, just use you for sales
-
-
realistically putting the number one newcoming artist (studio album wise) on ya cover means the advertising sales rocket !
-
those telesales guys for the advertising department would have had a fucking dream last week , they defo all hit bonus anyway
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
ex-NME here (from era w/100k+ paying readers). Editor/art director pick cover w/input from ads dept. Writer is complicit though.
-
yo
@NME why you so bad mind?
-
What's happened? Is the NME still a thing?
-
Sorry to hear this, but I'm glad you spoke up and had your say, they won't get away with this I'm sure
-
who owns the actual image?
-
to anyone saying being famous is easy, u can read this and stop saying shit like this
-
please ! today is my birthday! wish me happy bday
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.