Unclear if this article is referring to VP Biden’s cancer moonshot only... Having been part of the CANDLE project, this article lacks a fundamental understanding of the topics and approaches being worked on in the three CANDLE pilots.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Either way has problems. Big science U54 type stuff is starting to become a bridge fund for junior scientists (esp at lower tier places) because their personal proposal is unfundable for a myriad of reasons, some of which outside of their control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Decentralizing arguments are powerful but ultimately beg the question of why centralize any of the money into the NIH in the first place? It’s certainly a better use of funds than military adventurism but I haven’t seen sound arguments for market failure necessity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Must read!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about randomized clinical trials on bioplausibile but unproven ideas like Precision Medicine?
@VPrasadMDMPH@VincentRKThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When
@VPrasadMDMPH and I challenged the whole moonshot paradigm 4-5 yrs ago we were vilified as naysayers. Good to see our earlier takes validates. -
well, I didn't vilify you. You were correct.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.