I'm not surprised. My sense is that even die-hard leftists who downplay the significant of genetics on IQ, and who reject much of the the normative analysis of @Sailer_Sailer, regard his writing as authoritative regarding the statistical and other factual material he discusses.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't win so they shadow ban you. Why the hate
@Jackpic.twitter.com/cDsqWK4H0A
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fake Research Papers: How Did More Than 120 'Gibberish' Computer-Generated Studies Get Published?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When one of my clients announces to me that he is a tenured professor, I make a mental note to speak very slowly, like I would to a 2nd grader. I’ve known a lot of tenured professors. Nearly all have an agenda and preconceived notions. Few are original or critical thinkers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean it's not like a person like that, you know a paragon of virtue and ethical conduct, would have any sort of motive to discredit the Guardian unless... https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jan/10/ucl-to-investigate-secret-eugenics-conference-held-on-campus …pic.twitter.com/56ubvTq0vY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Protip: When you're trying to establish credibility, you generally want to source people who DON'T write creepy think pieces about raping unconscious/drugged children.pic.twitter.com/EQUGlPiJeB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plus this whole technique of coming up with some bullshit survey of expert opinion is old hat. It's anonymous so for all I know it could be Nyborg, Fuerst, Lynn, Haier, Woodley, Piffer, Gottfredson, Boutwell, Kirkegaard, and any number of other fringe researchers,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, and 6 percent were students who had published in a journal, which would include Piffer and Fuerst. Neither have doctorates and both have published in Intelligence. And I guarantee you this survey is stacked with Ulster Institute cronies because Rindermann is onepic.twitter.com/InBo9gGMlO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.