Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Steve_Sailer's profile
Steve Sailer
Steve Sailer
Steve Sailer
@Steve_Sailer

Tweets

Steve Sailer

@Steve_Sailer

America
unz.com/isteve
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Steve Sailer‏ @Steve_Sailer Jan 15

    Steve Sailer Retweeted Bonus

    Apparently, Mr. @TheDisproof, you have once and for all solved the Lumper vs. Splitter conundrum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumpers_and_splitters … I'm sure the philosophers of science are dying to hear why Lumping is better than Splitting. You should be writing treatises, not tweets!https://twitter.com/TheDisproof/status/952816298110615552 …

    Steve Sailer added,

    Bonus @TheDisproof
    Replying to @christopherburd @Steve_Sailer
    So you place more value on large subjective easily disproven undefined groups called traditional "races", than accurate genetically defined smaller groups of which there are 1000's? I suppose you think a KM is a more accurate measure than a mm.....
    12:24 AM - 15 Jan 2018
    • 6 Retweets
    • 33 Likes
    • Tom Berzerker Yegg Tyr Creegar Tequehead Len Brendon Peck 🍎 Darin Restore the Republic+++ Son of Enoch Powell
    5 replies 6 retweets 33 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 15
        Replying to @Steve_Sailer

        So you think that three, arbitrary, huge, indistinct, sweeping, easily disproven, traditional "race" groupings (that do not even match with genetics) are a better representation of an individual than tiny groupings (1000's of groups) which are genetically defined?!

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Ian Charboneau‏ @IanCharboneau Jan 15
        Replying to @TheDisproof @Steve_Sailer

        You think they are better representations that's why you refuse to risk your money You can say sprinkles aren't rain but unless you're willing to bet that you'll stay dry it's a moot point

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 16
        Replying to @IanCharboneau @Steve_Sailer

        So DO you think that three, arbitrary, huge, indistinct, sweeping, easily disproven, traditional "race" groupings (that do not even match with genetics) are a better representation of an individual than tiny groupings (1000's of groups) which are genetically defined?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Ian Charboneau‏ @IanCharboneau Jan 16
        Replying to @TheDisproof @Steve_Sailer

        I'm not sure what capital letters or so mean but I'm stating that you are so convinced that you won't risk your money All your ideas are like that, amazing if you were writing a cartoon show for children but if you actually had to live by the results you'd starve

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 16
        Replying to @IanCharboneau @Steve_Sailer

        So DO you think that three, arbitrary, huge, indistinct, sweeping, easily disproven, traditional "race" groupings (that do not even match with genetics) are a better representation of an individual than tiny groupings (1000's of groups) which are genetically defined?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Ian Charboneau‏ @IanCharboneau Jan 17
        Replying to @TheDisproof @Steve_Sailer

        and this is why I block leftists rather than talk, I makes me think less of my fellow man after I discuss things with them

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      8. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 15
        Replying to @Steve_Sailer

        So do you think that three, arbitrary, huge, indistinct, sweeping, easily disproven, traditional "race" groupings (that do not even match with genetics) are a better representation of an individual than tiny groupings (1000's of groups) which are genetically defined?????

        3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Frank Ch. Eigler‏ @fche Jan 15
        Replying to @TheDisproof @Steve_Sailer

        If you are assuming that race boundaries are proposed as crispy clean lines, then you're arguing against a straw man.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 17
        Replying to @Steve_Sailer

        You claimed (not me) people could easily recognise genetic "races" by simply looking at them, then go ahead and prove it, place the people in the image below into groups (as many or as few as you want) of your choice.pic.twitter.com/injagc9i6P

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. F̨̛̩̱̼̾͒̂͛͋̑̈́̃̚͟ͅN͖̳̺̫̘̩̗͑̏̍͗̕  🇺🇸  ✝‏ @scotirishviet Jan 15
        Replying to @Steve_Sailer @TheDisproof

        He's literally splitting hairs. Never argue with a blank avatar. They are cowards.

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. F̨̛̩̱̼̾͒̂͛͋̑̈́̃̚͟ͅN͖̳̺̫̘̩̗͑̏̍͗̕  🇺🇸  ✝‏ @scotirishviet Jan 15
        Replying to @scotirishviet @Steve_Sailer @TheDisproof

        Yeah. Phone Twitter doesn't show account creation date, but I'm betting it's quite new.pic.twitter.com/R37leCAQXS

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Bonus‏ @TheDisproof Jan 16
        Replying to @scotirishviet @Steve_Sailer

        You are getting a bit creepy.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info