that's a fair point
-
-
-
In US, Red States have inland cities that expand 360 degrees, makes land cheap, makes family formation affordable, family values appealing
-
But it's also regulation, as your post shows. Obviously geography is a potential limitation, but mostly cities don't even hit it
-
Even NYC is deliberately far far below the density it'd have reached without 1940s skyscraper regulations
-
(it's mythical that NYC natural features, like land, stopped these&
-
Outside of the CBD Sydney is extremely undense. It's a short five minute walk from skyscrapers to vacant lots and two story terraces.
New conversation -
-
-
You forget the man-made housing supply constraints.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Eliminating those housing constraints would leave more room for those of us who don't want to live in dense areas.
-
On the coast?
-
Nationwide. People have to live somewhere. More on the coast means less density inland.
-
Let me speak up a little: NOBODY WANTS TO LIVE IN THE OUTBACK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.