It's by no means impossible for Third World countries to stabilize their population. Bangladesh, for instance, is now down to replacement fertility, which means its population should top growing around c. 2060. But few dare ask Africa to do the same, because it sounds racist.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is it treated as a given that increased third world populations must result in immigration to the west? Are we just rolling over and yielding that result because the bureaucrats and invasion-facilitators can not be stopped?
-
Majorities in the western nations want mass immigration. They consistently vote for it.
-
No they don't. They've never voted for it. In fact, when they are polled about it they say no. The Americans had to be lied to to get Hart-Celler passed, were told their demographics would NOT change in order to pass it. Nobody wants mass immigration but bureaucrats and elites.
-
1. Nobody lied to the Germans about Merkel's welcome to millions and she won big. 2. Likewise France. And Canada. Sweden. &c. 3. Hillary was awfully close to winning. 4. Hart-Cellar did not start mass immigration; that's an anti-Semitic canard. It started with Reagan and Bush.
-
>You're falsely equating the election of politicians with a single issue, immigration. There are countless issues that each politician promotes and uses on their platforms. People vote on many things Hart-Cellar opened up immigration to non-european countries and was done in 1965pic.twitter.com/ZNJ0ebLcVH
-
If two thirds of them continue to vote for mass-immigration, it doesn't matter what they say in polls. It's clear mass immigration and population replacement is what they want. Patriotic views are not censored or secret there; they just lose every election.
-
Is everyone only voting for immigration when they go vote? Is that what you are telling me? The politicians run on only that issue?
-
It's not a low profile issue. And patriotic parties don't disagree much with the winners on other issues. The campaigns often consist of calling patriots racists and isolationists above all other messages. So if patriots can't pass 25%, people don't really want restriction much.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Somalia is proof that סמאל hates the world.
-
It’s also proof that an anarcho-capitalist/ Libertarian state can function
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Free LARC (long-acting reversible contraception) as an African aid program the right would get behind?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A cynic could say that if Africans will move en masse to Europe and cause society there to collapse, they will eventually evolve to have a higher average IQ just like the ancestors of the Europeans did. Of course, this would result in unheard-of suffering along the way. :(
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn. What happened to the legendary Siamese libido?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
whatever they are putting into the water in Haiti, they need to step up production for SS Africa...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.