I agree with that
There is no middle ground between Reince and NYT reporting. Testimony before Congress under oath is necessary to clarify truth of Russia :
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need nonpartisan
#SpecialProsecutor#NyetExcusesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don't most of your fellow Republicans in Senate and House see it this way?
-
Because the GOP was compromised long before Trump.
#Resist @havjoul@SteveSchmidtSES
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I hate to say this but does under oath carry the same clout it once did?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even then we will have to hear that the investigation is WRONG.That it was tainted somehow.Dig journalists dig
#IMPEACHABLEThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the BeTep blows. [Tim O'Brien/B.Dylan/Russian mashup]
#MeetThePress#AMJoypic.twitter.com/JjAVCXupGj
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I rather have testimony to law enforcement so there's a better chance of prosecution for lying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.