Why would Congress take this from a lame duck agency head? What’s the logic?
-
-
-
It’s why he said post 1/20/21 I think
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
DOJ isn’t that a euphemism for Barr. I’m not optimistic that it it will prove successful
-
*post 1/20/2021*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'll one up ya. Pass a rule change in the house to enforce inherent contempt and have the seargent of arms lock her up. ENOUGH!!
-
Thank you & I couldn’t agree more! The idea that this was laughed about when Barr didn’t comply is infuriating! These transgressions are no laughing matter. Dems being water guns to knife fights — ENOUGH!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If I mothered my children or my dog with the lack of consequence this Congress gives these offenders; they would not be fit for civil society.
- Show replies
-
-
-
DC will continue with the Sgt Schultz approach:pic.twitter.com/HGKTyUoddC
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Do it, House. Play hardball for once.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
This is a moment that requires the co-equal, legislative branch, of the American government to exercise its full power. Subpoena her immediately. Be prepared to refer a criminal contempt of Congress citation to the DOJ post 1/20/21