Steve is a lickerpic.twitter.com/XnBkAtW3yU
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You’ve made more media appearances this year alone than you’ve had town halls in a decade. You’re not worthy of us, you self-serving schmuck.
As one of your La constituents, I ask you not to support Kavanaugh. I also ask you to start caring more about your County instead of your increasingly corrupt Republican Party. History will not be kind, to both the Party and to you!
#VoteHimOut!
JIM FRANCIS FOR CONGRESS!
@JimFrancisLA01
LMAO @SteveScalise on @AmericaNewsroom on @FoxNews Only way this combo could be any more toxic is if @seanhannity @JudgeJeanine or @IngrahamAngle is interviewing him! What a joke, a corrupt politician talks about a corrupt judge on a corrupt TV station that deals in corruption!pic.twitter.com/fjd5MGeYgK
@SteveScalise Sir, I watched the entire 9-minute clip of your interview, and I notice how skillfully you parse your comments: (thread)
* You never once mention Dr. Ford—a statistics professor—or Ms. Ramirez—a former support-worker for domestic-violence survivors—by name, but you DO mention Stormy Daniels—a former porn actress—twice (both times in reference to her lawyer, whom you do NOT name).
* You refer to Judge Kavanaugh’s character and integrity at least 3 times, with 2 of the mentions framed in context of the 65 women who signed a letter vouching for their belief in the judge’s moral fitness for Supreme Court office,
but not once do you note that only 2 of those women have, since Dr. Ford’s identity became public, been willing to re-iterate their initial support when contacted by @politico.
* You present the Senate Judiciary Committee’s choice here as the simple weighing of testimony, between 2 women who currently accuse him of sexual assault, and 65 women who signed a Kavanaugh-endorsement letter *more than a week ago, when neither Dr. Ford’s
nor Ms. Ramirez’s accusations were public*—but not once do you mention Dr. Ford’s request that the FBI be engaged to conduct an investigation into her allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.
Consequently, you also do not mention that Chairman Grassley demurred on her request (insofar as it falls within SJC’s purview), refusing to ask the FBI to re-open its background check on Judge Kavanaugh—which re-opening could, depending on what it concludes
about Dr. Ford’s allegations, help establish the probability of Judge Kavanaugh’s susceptibility to future blackmail over potentially perjurious statements about his own conduct.
Dr. Tammy Savoie, Decorated Air Force Veteran, Will Challenge Steve Scalise she is a true American
Trump is a liar, GOP lies for Trump, Trump is morally corrupt. The American people have every right to question Kavanaugh’s credibility.
You should stop talking. Just end this shameful circus, vote, and send Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.