Do you think it is possible to create new metrics which actually capture certain degrees of quality?
Alternative headline: Metrics can’t capture the rich diversity of human scholarship, report findshttps://twitter.com/timeshighered/status/1204621078187958275 …
-
-
-
After decades of effort, that’s what we’ve got. And what we’ve got is deeply problematic.
@DORAssessment is working hard on a number of fronts but it’s disappointing that most rankers will not acknowledge or address their flawed methodologies. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Incidentally, that’s why experimental high-energy physicists ignore such metrics, whereas the article suggests to ignore experimental high-energy physics.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hmm, keep the ruler but throw away what you are trying to measure.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Ha! That’s brilliant. “What you do can’t be measured properly by the metrics we’ve developed to measure what you do and so we’re just going to pretend you don’t do what you do in fact do”.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Can I suggest a more cynical one? :P "Previous Top Metric Exploiters now out-Exploited by consortia: calls for putting a stop to it"
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Maybe they would also want to suggest that parties whose vote share cannot be predicted should be removed from the ballot paper?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.