I can agree with this statement. It's a shame that I am also not diverse. I appreciate works of art. I do not need to see the authors face. I do not need to know their real name. If their work is good, I will read/watch/stare/consume.
...I would never consider diversity in matters of art. Only quality. It seems to me that to do otherwise would be wrong.
-
-
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
It is just too goddamn early for this
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Prepare yourself, Stephen. You have invoked the wrath of WOKE TWITTER! Sure, you might be right, but that doesn't matter to them. Only one thing works against the evils of Woko Haraam: ignore them. But still, bravo on saying the obvious truth.
-
You should take a chance to read through some of the comments of the people you're dismissing. You might learn something.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Diversity should alwais exist, but quality would be the goal for every artist. The mistake is in prioritize art by diversity.
-
The mistake is to think diversity doesn't reach your doorstep because of its lack of quality. Or that your lens of "quality" is free of bias.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.