That also side steps the legislation. Sets a standard that says any court can keep any law they want in power. Even it it has been repealed by congress. Just keeps proving Judges are dictators in black robes.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still under the purview of the executive branch. Until the Supreme Court rules, the ruling means little if the executive chooses to forgo it. Much like Obama did in the moratorium on drilling in the gulf, and many, many other matters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can someone explain what rules prohibit the president from obeying federal judges? Gotta be some exceptions to this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
I do not understand, this is extorting money from the tax payers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
How about, "Who are YOU to 'order' me -- *another* branch of the gov't?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just ignore him like Obama did!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Judicial activism is a plague in US and everywhere. In Brazil, they are simple ignoring the current law and creating some perverted version instead...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How can this type of federal law insubordination occur? Judge John D. Bates stated that abolishing DACA was "arbitrary and capricious." Yet, allowing more than 700,000 ILLEGALs into our country to perpetuate the Liberal voting block is completely reasonable and justifiable
! -
Don't agree with it in this case, since Obama signed
#DACA 'on a whim', but here is the legal meaning for "arbitrary and capricious" :: https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/arbitrary-and-capricious/ … -
So, protecting our sovereignty, borders, & citizen's safety is unfounded, according to Judge Bates? It's infuriating to see these judges' audacious attempt to circumvent our Rule of Law. Let's call them for what they are. They're "Anchor Babies" masquerading as DACA adults.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.