And we need to give up the second amendment why? The first is clearly under attack. Why should judges be free from surveillance, when common Americans are subject to surveillance 24/7? It makes you wonder about the reason for their paranoia.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So this is like if you don’t like the track at the Daytona 500 you can switch the race to whatever track you want and still win the Daytona 500. Just ridiculous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IANAL but Interesting case. Could
#California state commissions meet in Fed courthouses to skirt the CA open meeting law, thus minimizing citizen oversight?@Patterico@instapundit@kausmickey@NickRekieta@pmarca@balajis - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Woah...They included the prefix "illegal"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From the article: "This is what we expect to see in a police state." Isn't "police state" redundant?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At the end of the day, lawful folks who have families who rely on them, will cow tow to a despotic government to avoid illegal prosecution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bottom line: "What the judge just said is if a city council can move to a federal building, they can keep the meeting secret," Gileno said. "That's grossly illegal."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No matter how I look at this the YTubber is in the right. What the hell is wrong with the judge?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.