I’ve noticed this trend. When a truth about something is unknown or denied, it is left open to interpretation. 1. Denying the ideology of Islam is partly responsible for violent clashes, leaves the population to draw its own conclusions. Such as skin colour being the problem.
-
-
-
2. Until recently, the precise nature of males and females had been left to interpretation which resulted in misogyny. Learning the differences has liberated both genders. The denial of these obvious and factual differences has led people to interpret it as they wish.
-
3. The article’s subject of race another observation. Without knowing the precise differences between genetic groups before science, society interpreted the sometimes obvious differences & drew their own conclusions. Denying it will only cause more harm when it doesn’t have to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Only solution is that science is racist, of course.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't see what's so well-meaning about obfuscating reality for the sake of egalitarian ideology, especially when a lot of those "well-meaning" people are keen to ruin the lives of (and in some countries actually prosecute) thoughtful dissidents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're not interested in having to defend their views. They just want to be right and to never be challenged bc that might imply that they're wrong. It's always about feelings, not facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who would've thunk there were differences in genes between a ginger that doesn't show up in photographs due to overexposure and a black person that doesn't show up due to underexposure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Liberals are the true "science deniers".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Many of us fear the reports will discourage support of measures to improve the lives of the marginalized
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The onslaught isn't coming from science, though. It's coming from these people, against science. The question is will science survive the onslaught.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your obsession with race and IQ is starting to lead me to believe you might just be a tad racist. It's ok to ask the question, but again you seem obsessed to discuss this thing that cannot change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
''well meaning"?! Is that another euphemism? (((Well Meaning People))) from (((Boas))) onward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It never survived the onslaught of the reality of human experience. Which is why the powers that be enforce political correctness so harshly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.