-
-
-
The democrat/communist regime knows it's about control. It's our weak, compromising reps that always cave and betray us.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is NOT a negotiation. It's a freaking war, people. The other side is playing for keepsies, not funsies.pic.twitter.com/GPf7d7mAJD
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally agree. This is why the left is willing to send out False Flags at any expense! They have no problem with " Collateral damage" on any type , if it gets them to their political agenda. Open your eyes. The truth is B4 your eyes





-
True That.For The Left,Never Forget That "The End Justifies The Means".
-
You got it! Now if we could just make apathetic voters understand. Most of mainstream media paid political whores( no nice way to put it ) WE ARE Effectively the truth media now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All gun laws are an infringement
-
-
Date issued: N/A. It wasn't granted to me by the US Gov. I've had it all along. It's my inherent right that cannot be taken away by a politician, or a vote of the mob.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the cost of freedom is high, How much do you think the left would pay to control it?pic.twitter.com/kRaFCqLHQb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The liberal motives are always based on emotions, never fact-based logic or common sense. Conservatives better stay out of the emotional arena or we’re all in trouble.
-
Exactly. They are reactive, not proactive. "The law is reason free from passion" for a damned good reason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The left wins if you do something sane and reasonable? I don't think you've defined your side very flatteringly.
-
You may think it's reasonable to sacrifice liberties for the false promise of safety; I do not. The history of the world certainly doesn't attest the fact that surrendering the means to defend one's self well serves the interests of individual liberty.
-
Seems your stand is completely arbitrary, unless you want to go all out, remove every regulation and, say, give drones to untrained toddlers pending only parental approval (or their absence/negligence).
-
lol. It's not arbitrary to want to avoid bloodshed, killing and death at every provocation for the sake of being perfectly logical. Indeed, being perfectly logical in organizing society would create an absolutely unlivable society.
-
Isn't that your opponents argument?
-
No, it isn't. You're conflating 'at every' with 'no matter the'. There are certain impositions on liberty that I'm willing to tolerate for the sake of avoiding conflict. It has limits... as I've already said.
-
And, curiously enough, the limits that is has are well short of the limits these gun control folks wish to impose. It's neither wise nor necessary to take to armed conflict at every provocation, no matter how slight. This, you claim, is an arbitrary position.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
