Lol “Ann Coulter’s in-depth writing”. Guys, there is no depth to Ann Coulter.
Most people don't know anything about the Central Park Five story outside the final verdict. @AnnCoulter's in-depth writing on the topic is essential reading if you actually want to know what you're talking about. http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2014-04-23.html …https://twitter.com/BenjaminDeetz/status/963513251635048448 …
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@AnnCoulter + essential reading in a single tweet.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read it,will admit it was a story I missed at the time.I have always admired Ann,today even more.Unbelievable how this unfolded,how in the hell this could’ve happened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No need to read any biased/hack/pho-journalism that has preposterous statements like this littered throughout: “Liberals are opposed to rape in the abstract, but when it comes to actual rapists, they're all for them.” Nothing written can be trusted with biases that blatant.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
President Due Process was a little ahead of the process. But that’s ok cause he said he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and he wouldn’t be convicted. All about the process, right Mr Mueller?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NYC courts are a shithole. The ABA should be ashamed of its members that accept and tolerate this rancid behavior by their various members.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if you accept all of this as true, it still doesn’t make make calling for the death penalty reasonable. I wonder why he felt these people should die?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I wouldn't recommend directing anyone to
@AnnCoulter about anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"in depth writing"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
One confession n a DNA match doesn't prove innocence of CP five. It proves one guilty person. CP 5 weren't just innocent 5. They were assaulting people in the park.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.