Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

This interview was fantastic, i could almost see the brain wiring of the questioner being reconnected in a different way when told a truth she never considered. it was almost magical. thank you for this moment.

your failure to understand does not equate him being a fraud, especially since many people seems to understand something you don't, you should ask yourself whether you alone are right in your assessment or not.

She failed to understand the nuance of his answers. Poorly equipped for this interview.

Omg! He does a great job of not getting mad. That is how every Liberal argues. Strawman after strawman.

'What you're saying is..'

If you had listened to him ever at any length, then you would know he stood his ground succinctly. He also knew he would not get through to the presenter in any meaningful way, and so limited his replies to simplicity.

Is there a woman on earth who can ask a question and LISTEN TO THE ENTIRE ANSWER without interrupting?

You mean like the strawman where she claimed Peterson compared trans activists to Mao?

Condescending harpie.