Completely agree and am disgusted by it. Weaponizing sexual assault for political gain is the progressive left's new 'active measure' to attack adversaries.
Welcome to the age where every non-leftist politician will be accused of the most egregious moral horrors, be predictably abandoned by the GOP and be found guilty in the court of public opinion regardless of the evidence.
-
-
-
they are not supposed to be using it for political gain . You have to remember it involves Hollywood too
-
Hollywood isn't fabricated; Al Franken's initial accuser, Tweeden, came from that arena. Al's comeuppance was like a bone thrown their way. Dems seized upon it to create a precedent they could use against Moore and his rising poll numbers. To Dems, ends always justify the means.
-
Hollywood is bad ..My Old drama teacher was a director from the US and wanted to give me acting work Isayno
-
My heart goes out to women who were victimized by that evil Hollywood power. However, I have more respect for women who said, "No" and walked away. Those that went along with their games caused even more women to be abused.
-
all the suspicious deaths of all our famous people put in bad situations medically and socially
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Remember when Stefan used to advocate for peaceful parenting? Guess that stops at aged 14
-
The idea behind being a peacful parent is that it's wrong to use violence against a child. Roy Moore has shown he has no issue with sexually assaulting teens as young as 14. Supporting Moore seems to fly in the face of being an advocate of non-violence against children.
-
Those are some pretty egregious claims that no one has provided evidence for yet
-
True, there's not enough evidence to get a conviction in a court, but that doesn't mean we aren't allowed to look at the evidence we do have and make educated judgements. Same goes for Bill Clinton, Conyers, and Frankin. It's their word vs accusers word.
-
Clinton, Conyers, and Franken had court settlements and photographs proving their guilt. Moore had a forged yearbook and other accusers caught in lies
-
Doubt could be seen in all those cases, even the Frankin picture could have been a gag that she consented to. What I can't figure out is why are we to believe a lifelong, authoritarian politician?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He can express his opinions and people can vote for him (or not) based on those opinions. What is deeply corrosive of democracy is to have unproven allegations from 4 decades ago trawled up in order to smear one candidate and thereby influence the result of an election.
-
You mean like when Trump brought Bill Clinton’s accusers to the debate last year?
-
Both are wrong and indicative of the ethical wasteland that is US politics today. (By the way, Bill Clinton wasn't the candidate and did have proven form but I've taken your point.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It worked in Alabama. Dems are experts at this. Weak minded conservatives fall for these tactics every time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.