OK. OK. We failed miserably BUT we can perfectly predict the climate in 2100.
A $150 Billion Misfire: How Disaster Models Got Irma Wronghttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-11/-150-billion-misfire-how-forecasters-got-irma-damage-so-wrong …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If these computer models can't predict an active storm and its behavior. How can they predict weather 20-30 years from now?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And these are the same models that think they've got 'global warming' down to dictate policy. I don't think so...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They didnt take the confluence of solar flares, severe geomagnetic storms and the full moon into account for their modeling data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but climate change
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All in all the forecasting was pretty damn good. There are so many factors to consider, it's amazing that the models work so well. 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/2 Difference here was the angle of approach to the west coast was nearly parallel to coast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Modelers were unable to predict the path of Irma for the next 24hrs, but climate 'scientists' are confident about their models to 2100
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now who makes money on this? Lots of big corporations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.