Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

agree to disagree

The insane never allow facts to get in the way of their neuroses.

Postmodernism

In your opinion is it acceptable, or okay to say it when the subject isn't involving empirically verifiable objective facts?

I like this one better –> "I would agree with you but then we'd both be wrong!"

Lol

Reality is hurtful and inconvenient

Or when they say "Thats just your point of view when you are obviously right"

"separate checks should be assumed in every instance unless expressed before meal" good arguments both ways.

I'm gonna have to disagree with this one Stef.

look just stop all news briefings period! they are so hateful.

empirically verifiable objective facts exist only in a vacuum where political ideologies do not exist.

You have to remember, during the last 40 years in public schools, relativism has ruled! According to them, facts do not matter, feelings do

Well @StefanMolyneux I 'agree to disagree' that I lost the argument and want to move on, not that I will believe your argument at all.