EXACTLY! How can any restraint in spending be successful when one can vote for someone else to pay for more HANDOUTS! Socialist stupidity!
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good for them. Should be 100%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
No wonder I get slammed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This pisses me off to no end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gee, that makes me feel so special knowing that I'm carrying their tax burden & it makes me feel so good paying my extra self employed tax.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet there was ANOTHER record set for tax taken from us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The left are the 44%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's a descrepancy in these tweets. 44% vs 4%. Mighty big difference. Stemmingmakerij! Or maybe just an innocent mistake...?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, what about the "fair share" philosophy? What is their share?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yeah must've typed another 4 lol
-
You have to click the link to see you again the other for some reason the graphic cuts it off
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
An interesting example of how a headline can be misleading. One instantly jumps on the 44% number while the body of the story is different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.