They would have never surrendered. Millions more would have died. Read about it. Citizens were ready to defend the island.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Another way to look, was the loss of several hundred thousand allied troops to save 1 million Japanese civilians worth it,no
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Sorry Stefan, but you're missing the best reason for the use of the bombs: so the world would see what they do.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is better that we used very weak nuclear bombs then, than the far more powerful ones that came later.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what is a must at one time may not be a must in another time ! Babak
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No sympathy for the Japanese after what they did during WW2, from the UK viewpoint at least Japan got what it deserved
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
my father lived in Kure. He was almost killed by the Bomb. HE thought the bombing was necessary, to save Japan...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They did start the war, and hindsight is 20/20. So any post mortem will include at least some Monday morning quarterbacking
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.