no, they adopted *real world capitalism*, which has used considerable protectionism and government intervention
-
-
-
if no protectionism & gov't intervention would have been better than 70-fold output increase & fewer work days
-
no, it wouldn't. Free trade causes poverty and stops a country from industrialising
-
and yet countries not industrializing are authoritarian, interventionist and anti-free market. huh.
-
LOL. China = huge success story = authoritarian, interventionist and massive protectionism
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Somalia didn't adopt Lasseiz faire capitalism. It's just a failed state. I doubt 99% of Somalians know what capitalism is.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
What's "right-wing as fuck" mean?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
They'd have to be libertarian right on that compass in order to be Lasseiz faire. Can you provide a link to that?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Authoritarianism is coercive. Lasseiz faire by definition can have no coercive involved. Somalia is not lasseiz faire.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
thus the need for more 3rd world workers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ethno state with free market capitalism is the best option.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
third world countries tend not to have free market capitalism. And definitely not ethno state.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I can already name one that works, we call it Japan.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
pedophilia rate is much lower then the UK today. Suicide has more to do with Japanese culture itself, one of the
-
largest economys, birth rates are a problem I agree.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.