Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

and what stats are you basing that on Stefan? on that subject you do know that nearly all studies are based on a very small subset of a regional demographic and then multiplied to match the population numbers?.... this is so far from accurate its laughable #justsayin

As much as I disagree with @StefanMolyneux . I agree with him here about women. Feelings matter to women more than men. Priorities are completely different in women. Physical force to condemn speech is completely within reason for the majority of women's point of view.

They believe in the best of people so aren't as worried about limiting speech because they think that the one time they ban something is all it will be used for. Men instinctively know once you ban something it becomes much easier the second and subsequent times.

They generally support free speech if it involves exposing their nipples to strangers. Many of them just don't like it when men state facts about Biology.

They are more dishonest and selfish than men.

It is viewed as more nuturing to them to suppress speech that is angry/hostile.

....I'm guessing you're not married.... ~:O

Obviously because it's the right thing to do because they are all goddesses

Because intersectional ideology panders to women more than men, so it’s easier to get women to vote for intersectional/“progressive” policies. But that’s not an issue with gender. Gender has nothing to do with it. It comes down to the specific ideology.

My explanation would be that social engineers don't write propaganda to women telling them about the benefits of free speech. Im pretty sure they would rather point to you Stefan and say theres why we need to censor people. They constantly insult women. I wouldn't buy it myself.

I think it comes down to condemning or criticism. I think men take words more as criticism and try to persevere where as women take the same statement as condemnation a attack on themself even when its not about them just a thought.