IQ is not a measure like height or weight!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What? Nothing becomes more-or less- genetic as one ages. That's silly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Hjorvik@DrBioblogo@VaryIngweion que opinais? sabeis si eso es cierto? -
Pienso tres cosas. 1. Que una gráfica no tiene sentido si no está acompañada del resto del paper. 2. Que correlación no implica causalidad. 3. Que el IQ se relaciona directamente con el nivel educativo de los participantes, el adquisitivo y el nivel de bienestar del país.
-
Sobre el punto 1, estoy en la calle y no puedo leer ahora mismo el paper (solo hay acceso público para el abstract, necesitaría loguearme con mis credenciales del CSIC para descargar el artículo entero y ahora y desde el móvil no puedo. Así que aplíquense los puntos 2 y 3.
-
Añadiré que el artículo es de 1997, época en la que aún se creía que el IQ servia para algo.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For a good read on innate qualities:https://knowingneurons.com/2019/01/23/book-review-innate-how-the-wiring-of-our-brains-shapes-who-we-are/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but it means nothing, in less than a century we gonna have AI systems with an IQ of 1000 and we the humans we will merge with machines
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely untrue Check out the paper named the mainstream science on intelligence with 52 signatories a lot of them are for hereditary but they never said 80 That's just preposterous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok. But isn't there some sort of 80/20 principal? Isn't it possible that the other 20% makes a disproportional difference?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.