If I were going to criticize you about intelligence, I would specify an issue. Takes 1-3 statements. People who talk about "proper training", "mishandling", etc., can't even define the terms. Ditto for "science", "criteria", "scientific observation", etc. Credentialism. sheesh
You are wrong, and offensive, and you have done no research whatsoever. I have interviewed many of the world’s top experts in human intelligence: http://www.fdrurl.com/iq Please educate yourself.https://twitter.com/goescarlos/status/1168881755731873793 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
... "assumption".. the Mother of all...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interviewing people is not the same as having an educaton in science and statistics. Not a valid argument, Stef.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Interviewing top experts doesn't make you one. Like most right-winger, you will cherry-pick the data to fit your narrative.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What about when an actual genius debunks these theories? Any thoughts on this
@StefanMolyneux?https://solidarity-us.org/atc/54/p2870/Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is not wrong, he's correct. Why is what he said here offensive?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 12 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.