Can we please agree wikipedia is not science?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts and statistics is rasis and sheeit, oy vey.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wikipedia should not be used as a fact-finding source. It should not be used at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Scientific racism” tries to imply racism with a thin superficial veneer of science. In reality, there is nothing racist about the scientific study of differences between races. It is just science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does anyone actually use Wikipedia?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Guess what? Science is biased. Human measurement is flawed. Most ppl would like to “test” an hypothesis that will more likely prove their beliefs than not. Science is becoming more and more manipulative. Anyone that studies and writes about research (including myself) would agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hate Facts!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Intelligence Quotient is the #1 Future Indicator Of Success or failure in life. “Science by definition cannot be racist.”


- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The first one I looked at was Eric Turkheimer, who found that, until you get to the wealthiest people, genes have almost no role to play in IQ, so it seems like you aren’t actually listening to the science.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.