Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

That's correct. You didn't.

For how long has this lipstick debate been going on? It feels like it has been days

However, that wasn't my point, and Im sure you know it. Straw man argument.

I thought that lipstick was popularized when the upper class started wearing them to stand out more

And I clearly supported the facts of your assertions about lipstick in numerous posts. The facts and the ad-homonym attacks/ innuendo are 2 separate issues and not limited to the lipstick discussion.

Lipstick is a tool. Not sure why that is offensive. I will still wear lipstick sometimes. Ladies, calm tf down.

What if the lipstick was merely a clever way for a women to draw attention to a her mouth while she is speaking so that the listener would be inclined to pay attention? Sort of like the perfectly melodic songs a bird uses to pass along information?

The argument that riled people up is that the lipstick is a female power display, female defensiveness to attack on their power tools is understandable when considering what we accomplish with lipstick while men justify expenditures on guns and bombs.

I'm a young straight man and I Really want to have kids with a YOUNG FERTILE WOMAN. I'm not in the market for infertile women that didn't birth and raise my children. Sue me.

Uh it bothers me when people say "ad hominem attacks." An attack is what an ad hominem is by definition. More on point, they feel personally attacked because they want lipstick more than food.