Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

Or you can say something by implication, e.g. "I've spoken against white nationalism before, but I'm an empiricist."

If you talk around something long enough, the true meaning of your words emerges through what has not been said. Everybody knows this, don't even try to make it seem like you don't also know it.

They said the same thing about Milo Yiannopoulos and it was a preposterous lie.

some of us would dig deeper in search of the evidence before dismissing out of hand. Those genuinely interested in Truth, anyhow.

These days, any good things said about Western Civilization is called "white supremacy."

Read and challenge makes sense to me #stubborn

If mainstream media says "xyz" about someone, Wikipedia considers it a reliable source. More than if the actual person says something different. Obviously, they need some standards, but the ones they have are seriously lacking.

Many people with the measurable intelligence quota known as "IQ" (A small part of the intelligence spectrum) are quite inherently CAPEABLE of thinking for themselves/critical thinking. That doesn't mean that they engage in those things, in my experience.