You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don't owe @StefanMolyneux an apology for hodling him accountable to his perspectives thru expectation of reputable sources (outside of interviews ie: peer reviwed journals) that don't drip with his own biases...I am an academic, scientist, and educator...BS does not work herehttps://twitter.com/nikkikool1/status/1156255244336160770 …
Come on - I interviewed the editor of the scientific journal “Intelligence.” He did most of the talking. Science – and basic decency – means being able to admit when you are wrong. Give it a try, trust me – it’s not so bad, and decent people will respect you more.
Putting this herehttps://twitter.com/scientistmel/status/1156263465545322497?s=21 …
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1156262966481903617 …If you'd like to see how proper citations work and what sources look like from varying reputable places... Check out my channelhttp://Youtube.com/scientistmel
You can also actually download ALL of my sources on my websitehttp://scientistmel.com
Putting this here for clarificationhttps://twitter.com/scientistmel/status/1156263465545322497?s=21 …
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1156262966481903617 …That's your argument? That because the journal is called "Intelligence" he should be accepted as an authority on intelligence? That is so precious. Do you think the editor of "Spy" was a secret agent?
The problem isn't with Melody - from what I've seen, she welcomes correction - the problem is with you incorrectly thinking that she's wrong.
Next up, Stefan Moleux interviews the editor of the Journal of the Flat Earth Society. He let's him do most of the talking.
What would you know about what decent people do?
some people are programmed to never admit they're wrong, because would mean admitting the views of their masters (they don't have their own) would be wrong as well
Says the guy making some weird roundabout argument that seems to almost unintentionally justify pedophilia while also degrading women at the same time.
Did you get him to sign your calipers afterwards?
Here's a newsflash, Stefan. A lot of decent people already respect her as much as we respect actual science and reason. What we don't respect are dumbfucks who make baseless, uneducated blanket statements about men and women then try to sell all that bullshit as "truth".
"I think we're beyond that, don't you?"
There's no respecting a leftist who religiously proselytizes and calls it "science", same reason why she's left cut and pasting her own responses, like regurgitating her own scripture as if it's meaningful.
Also, videos of interviews with academics talking about things in their field are in fact credible sources. Where did this quack learn how to do research?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
