Growing up in a community with a lot of Indians I will say they are not racist. Meaning they harbor no hatred. But they have extreme in-group preference and generally look down on other minorities. That is just my experience.
No need to get hysterical.
If the data I cite is incorrect, just rebut it, I will be happy to correct my thinking.
I look forward to your response. 
https://twitter.com/DharmicFundoo/status/1155355206890283013 …
-
-
-
Your tweet makes no sense
-
What I mean to say is it’s possible to not hate but have preference to your own kind. I don’t think that’s an issue of racism. You can be critical of those who don’t share same cultural values without being racist.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe it’s not hate. Maybe it’s cognitive dissonance resulting from being told from birth that you’re at the pinnacle of humankind- then looking around and seeing YT with the wealth, accomplishments, and overall better society.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's wisdom that might see us into a Renaissance of appreciation for the natural world but intelligence that tells us we can define that as we go.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is IQ really that reliable at predicting intelligence?https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9755929/IQ-tests-do-not-reflect-intelligence.html …
-
This article simply makes the point that better testing gives a more complete picture of IQ. Who would argue with that? However, current tests seem to correspond, generally, with income.
-
That’s not the point at all... the point is that a single test can’t accurately predict intelligence, including IQ tests. If IQ relates statistically to income, the conclusion may be other than intelligence predicts income.
-
It seems to be “accurately” predicting something. Accurate is a spectrum. I don’t think anyone would say a 30 min test could be 100% accurate. Is it accurate enough to predict certain things? Seems so. If we made better tests would there be more accuracy? Yes. Why discount it?
-
If it’s not accurately predicting intelligence than it shouldn’t be considered a good tool for precisely that. If it relates statistically to other things, it may not be bc of intelligence but for other aspects specific to the test.
-
I don’t think you have much of a point. We use differs metric to judge all sorts of things, happiness, sanity, intelligence. Shall we through it all out, because it’s not perfect. I think not. The more ways we can understand ourselves is worthwhile.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've never seen a leftist cite persuasive sources.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts usually don't fit into the illogical world view. Mr Spock would be so disappointed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Data *are*, Mr Science-Philosopher
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If suppose that data is correct, what do you infer from it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.