Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

He kinda has you pegged on the logic. You can't really support the evidence with using other "social scientists" as experts when feminists use the same "Rational empiricist" logic. The point he is trying to make is self evident and mathematical.

A feminist can cite 18 experts that sexual assault on campuses exist and here are the top experts on sexual assault theory with empirical evidence. But my friend, the "Rational" empiricism doesn't work.

"I know someone good who told me" defenses are weak.

His first claim is "cognitive intelligence" as a field of scientific study is not actually "science", because the knowledge claim they make can't be rationally agreed upon or falsifiable. Secondly most of their statistical evidence is ridiculous and poorly done

Social science has largely ensured that societies remain fixed within the 'accountant' bean-counter logic where human pleasure, potential is reduced to dumb factoids 1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted some races are dumb because of lower iqs kissing burns 300 calories

LOL

Yes and you have been educated but choose to still be running with quack science!

If non-whites have lower intelligence... how do they have the white population of planet earth backed into a corner and hating themselves?

don't become a factoid nerd like Shapiro, @StefanMolyneux . It's unbecoming. Empirical logic ensured you were a 'rational skeptic' atheist using Dawkins logic a few years ago.

18 experts that agree, to the exclusion of the many experts that disagree, like @nntaleb, is confirmation bias in pursuit of an agenda. IQ-determinism is quack nonsense.