Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

50% of all slaves were taken in the last 100 years of the trade, and most ended up in the Carribean and Brazil. Far more slaves were taken to these locations than anywhere else & the brutality meant early death....

The children of the women taken into Arab lands were absorbed by the societies they lived in. So much so that those people today have nonegligble African admixture. In North Africa & Maghereb up to 30%, Saudi 20%, Palestinians as much as 15% & High as 30% in places like Yemen...

Yes I do logic, the majority of people taken by Europeans during the slave trade died within 10 to 15 years being worked to death. Places like Jamaica were like battery farms, taking slaves killing them through overwork & then restocking by repeated trips to the African coast...

Slavery in South America and the Carribean featured the vast majority of slaves taken. They didn't practice generational slavery like in North America. Slaves were worked to death, like cattle these people didn't survive to have children....

Compare that to the Arab slave trade that was a trickle trade that lasted millenia in mostly females who did domestic work as concubines in Arab hareems. These women had children gained rights through their status as mothers to the children of Arab/North African men....

The people of the middle east and north Africa today are thus a product of the Arab slave trade and owe large chunks of their ancestry to the women who were taken into slavery. How can u denounce a slave when your ancestral mothers were slaves....