Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

No, just the compulsory child birth that has existed since time immemorial. Human reproduction. Not infanticide. Where birth might kill the mother (a rarity, but still possible) you should let the mother decide whether to have the child or not.

And what of the vast majority of American woman alone who abort for socioeconomics? (I.e. I'm in training/school, I have too many kids, I literally cannot afford to raise a kid) Abortion is largely done to prevent poverty and neglect from circumstances

You don't get to kill your children because you're poor. Neither does society get to kill poor children because we fear they'll grow up to be criminals. Nor do you get to euthanize children because they'll be hungry or unhappy. Can't afford a kid? Marry the father.

You don't get the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body.

The woman argument doesn't hold water when 50% of women are against abortion....

And you think human rights should be determined by a majority vote?

You are trying to dodge the fact that you says 'womens' bodies. Plus you don't believe in human rights, unless your saying women are pregnant with sea turtles.....

Yes. All of the organs in a woman's body belong to her. If another person is attached to them in order to survive, she has the right to say no, regardless of whether it is a six-week-old fetus or a thirty-eight-year-old philanthropist.