Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

No. These same ‘smart’ people believe in crack pot conspiracy and are usually anti-intellectual. It takes more than a few books read to be smart

The only anti-intellectualism I'm seeing here is coming from the person saying they're just as smart without having to do the book learning. Allowing your preconceived notions of who you are talking to make you ignore the evidence of your own eyes must be *very* intellectual.

And exactly what evidence is in front of their eyes? The secret Jewish cabal? Maybe it was Obama’s secret Islamic identity? Oh, what about the pedophile ring inside of a basement, that doesn’t exist. I could go on and on, the right is in the most literal sense anti-science.

Do groups have certain traits? Yes. However, they aren’t immutable. Not all black people are fast. Race is a social construct because humans literally made it and ethnic and racial categories have changed through time.

And the grounds on which you deny people rights are stupid. IQ has been shown to be environmental and not even an accurate predictor of intelligence. And even if a group had lower IQ, so what? Do you want to get rid of disabled people too?

That's objectively not true. IQ is between fifty and eight percent genetic. Go listen to Sam Harris interviewing Charles Murray. Educate yourself a little bit then you can come back and we can have a conversation.