Just so everyone understands, the images in the New York Times article about “radicalization” on YouTube reflect a “sampling” of the young man’s multi-year viewing history, I assume specifically chosen by the NYT. No objective methodology that I can see. So activism IMO.
-
Perhaps if you read the article you’d have some basic understanding of its contents.
Sigh "The Making of a YouTube Radical" - The New York Times Rebutted!https://youtu.be/HWc5_4uKOg8
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.