Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

All those words and not a speck of investigation into actual ideas.

They ARE interchangeable -- they all mean Bad WrongThinker. What more need be said?

The Overton window has moved so far left that they can use any term they want that isn’t “progressive” to describe any position that isn’t the party line.

Agreed that they are not interchangeable, but perhaps holding views that are traditionally ascribed to these categories confuses people-most are not use to an independent thinker

Not an argument

is it possible that they describe a venn diagram of which you fall into the overlap section of all three? doesn’t that seem like a simpler conclusion than thinking that the editor thought they were interchangeable?

They promoted the editors from the lazy ranks of journalists.

I recognised most of the persons on the display and had never really thought of them as 'far right' I am curious if there is anyone there you would classify as 'far right'

They've given up.... Owners, Bezos-type billionaires don't want public review. They want PR. #NYT "The Truth is Hard" LOL

How are any of these people considered "elites" when they can't tell the difference between those political labels?

Are there any "real editors" left? Especially at the NYT?

On purpose. They distinguish anything other than leftism

They ridiculous.

Their FULL of it, to the brim. Giant Hugs

“Lazy.” Right. They, to quote the robot himself Marco Rubio, “know exactly what they’re doing.”

The best thing to do with a spoiled brat..... is ignore it.

Why not?

Let the New York Times editor be simple and lazy. But you gained even more publicity. I think it's eventually useful for your image...