It does not QUITE say that. That's your interpretation. None of we three have actually broached that subject.
-
These are easily verifiable truths. If you have a problem with them, then disprove at least one.
-
-
Indeed.
-
I've been following for years, Stefan. And I don't just listen; I check claims myself. As it happens, I was already rather familiar with the subject before I ran across your podcasts.
-
Having been a long-time member of Mensa (which has among the lowest of requirements). And years ago I considered joining the 4-Sigma Society, but expense and no perceived benefit except bragging rights. I found members to whom I spoke tended toward the insufferably vain.
-
Whereas my Mensa friends tend to be good people, if not always politically compatible with myself; yet none of them are generally petty or vain.
-
But one must distinguish between a general group of intelligent people, and a group of intelligent people who want to join a club whose main purpose seems to be advertising that they are intelligent people. Mensa's membership list is confidential.
-
I don't think 4 Sigma even exists anymore. And I think the reasons are rather obvious.
-
It seems the successor to 4 sigma today is The Prometheus Society... But I've already taken far more difficult tests than their accepted standards, and I'm just not interested in proving that to anyone anymore.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.