Damn I lost a lot of respect for Mike @s0apx
Look, Mike is clearly getting a lot of pressure to disavow our conversation.
I gave him the scientific data that validates my positions, but he still refers to them as “views.”
I sympathize with him. Not everyone has the same tolerance for controversial facts.
Be well Mike 
https://twitter.com/michaelshermer/status/1134569024119906304 …
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's good that he's skeptical. But sometimes I think he gets so skeptical that he doesn't even believe the truth no matter how much evidence supports it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So what Mike is essentially saying is that we should only have conversations with people in our choir or echo chamber. How boring and stagnant. I've learned more from people outside my worldview (i.e.. Benjamin Boyce).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I do not understand the controversy. WTF is wrong with Mr. Molyneux? Did I miss something?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Just proves he's a weak minded and easily corrupted person if he caves in so fast...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This means to me that you have pointed out
@michaelshermer as unwilling to discuss what I have been calling the "Murray Discrepancy", after@charlesmurray. With libertarian atheists, either politics ultimately blinds or faith ultimately liberates.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.