they're not really high IQ if they get brainwashed easily by being exposed to atheistic views
-
-
-
I was just about to say the same. Molyneux's head is quite large, but it's apparently filled with air.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the old religions can not survive modern science. the doctrine of the church needs to embrace evolution, and evolve the doctrine..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My road to atheism had 0% influence from the school system, and it happened long before I entered college. I also haven’t had a single professor bring up religion. Unless you count basic biology as anti-theism. I might agree but it’s the facts of life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One source for you Stefan http://www.asanet.org/research-and-publications/journals/social-psychology-quarterly/why-liberals-and-atheists-are-more-intelligent … And a little graph in case that's too long for youpic.twitter.com/itUFMpOICv
-
Brought to you by "Snopes"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anecdotal, but I'm in college and rarely come across no anti-theist professors. One of the philosophy professors I had was a William lane Craig supporter for example. Both of my religious studies professors were Christian.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@StefanMolyneux Are you still an atheist?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who needs a source? Just say, "It's that simple." One and done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...slightly less intelligent than secular liberals" They have the participation trophies to prove it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I find it hard to believe liberals are smarter than conservatives. Something like 90% of convicts and welfare recipients vote democrat/liberal. Maybe I need to commit a crime and give up on life, might make me smarter.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sources are meaningless when they only offer a leading hypothesis and clearly contrived evidence to support the theory. The more intelligent a person is the more likely they are to recognize the value of free exchange. Classically this meant you were a liberal. That's the trick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.