Show this thread
It’s funny watching nit-pickers whine that I did not always TECHNICALLY DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN “VALIDITY” AND “SOUNDNESS” in my book “The Art of the Argument” 1. It’s aimed at a general audience = “ART” 2. Logicians have failed to popularize their technical terms - not my fault
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"I am ignorant, it's not my fault."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for all your content.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Philosophy is all about the nuances though... You could aim it at the general public, but if philosophers don't understand them after they have used your book as source, that's not good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didnt you know jargon and technical lingo enhance book sales to laymen?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You should take some time to watch
@NormanGYoung at@politicsoutside debunk your collectivist/individualist differentiation in Plato’s Republic. You say you’re all ears for criticism so I hope you interact with it.https://youtu.be/8nmw8r09hdk - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The distinction is literally philosophy 101
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If one must word-think to defeat you, they've already lost.
@ScottAdamsSays - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Also, who's nitpicking? Is it that increasingly pudgy Logicality Rocks or whatever his name is?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.