-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. To polarised
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course not. This is about emotion, tribe, power relations...philosophy can only resolve a debate between people who agree that philosophy will be the deciding factor on who is right. Still, Godspeed!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I bet if we had the choice to abort these kids up to 18 years old, more of em would act right! It might lead to less abortions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As far as I'm concerned it's her decision...not mine, not yours. I don't think philosophy can touch this unique dilemma.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Biology and christian morality solved it long time ago.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Scientifically they're not human being. And that's it.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
No, but GOD'S WORD can! Thou shalt not kill!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Does philosophy conclude Murder is wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, because philosophers rarely come to agreement. That's partly because they don't propose hypotheses and then test them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.