Either you are a platform or a publisher. As soon as you start making editorial decisions, you have decided to be the latter. No executive at any of those businesses wants what comes with that decision, but right now no one is enforcing those consequences.
No sane person is talking about governments controlling social media. If social media are going to pick and choose which arguments are allowed on their platforms, then they need to be subject to defamation laws, just like magazines and newspapers.https://twitter.com/Spectralbub85/status/1125048685321170945 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
I say it so much im a broken record. By their actions they are clearly publushers and should be treated as such. NOT neutral platforms they purport to be....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should be treated as public service platforms (like telephone companies) and be forced to uphold the freedom of speech.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting, so many who believe they are "liberal" resort to a popular knee-jerk reaction, comparing everything to Hitler and the Nazis as if it is somehow a measuring stick to compare everything else by, not saying I always trust Gov. competency but are they really the Nazis?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mandate equal access and no viewpoint discrimination. Just like telephones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
"alt- right" is libspeak meaning anyone I disagree with about anything at all
End of conversation
-
-
-
@Timcast has made a good argument that a president has already been set for government not to control social media. I really want to see a conversation between you, Tim &@Styx666Official about this.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't in good faith be against net neutrality and then flip and call for the government to intervene.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's about preventing concentrations of power. Corporations, Unions, small businesses, government, citizen action committees, and the public at large should all be in a constant state of checking it each other to prevent any single group from dominating society.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't get this, sincerely. I don't see how can a pro defamation law stance and the NAP be reconciled.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give it a few. Jack met with Trump. They will be controlling all of it. We are almost there.
-
I wondered about this excellent point. Either Jack refused an offer, or he accepted one. Jack didn't just walk out of the WH with a gift bag. At this stage I trust only POTUS. All others are 'opinion pending'. I watch with interest…
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But one political party IS controlling social media, financial platforms, banks, AirBnB, Uber, etc.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Social media giants have, quite literally, NO right to tell us what we should & should not hear, read or watch. More so because they're blatantly Leftist. That they are doing it now is especially disturbing, with the election not far away. This needs to be stopped, fast.
#smdh - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.